Is ReputationDefender.com the answer? - Peter Black's Freedom to Differ

Thursday, 14 December 2006

Is ReputationDefender.com the answer?

Writing for FindLaw's Writ, Julie Hilden looks at defamation on the internet and asks "with US courts strongly supporting website users' immunity from suit, should would-be plaintiffs resort to ReputationDefender.com"? Read the answer here.

14/12/2006 6:58:00 AM | Academic Articles, Defamation, Internet, Media, United States

2 Comments

Very nice article.

Posted by: Todd | Thursday, 31 July 2008 at 03:17 PM

Very nice article.

Posted by: Todd | Thursday, 31 July 2008 at 03:17 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.

NEXT POST

Google Book Search: iTunes for authors or Napster for books? An interesting article on the Google Book Search: Travis, Hannibal, "Google Book Search and Fair Use: iTunes for Authors, or Napster for Books?" . University of Miami Law Review, Vol. 61, pp. 601-681, 2006 Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=944048 Abstract: Google plans to digitize the books from five of the world's...

PREVIOUS POST

Introducing Rock Phish Check out this intrigiung story from PC World: The first thing you need to know about Rock Phish is that nobody knows exactly who, or what, they are. Wikipedia defines the Rock Phish Kit as "a popular tool designed to help nontechnical people create and carry out phishing attacks," but...

Pete Black

Lawyer, lecturer, blogger, geek and obsessive compulsive Twitterer

1 Following

2 Followers

Search

Become a Fan

Connect With Me

Recent Comments

Tony: Zach Braff needs to do more stuff. Hes under-ra... | more »

On Download This Show: Zach Braff, Wearable Technology, Ecomobility
Kiefer: oh well now what to say and what to think and w... | more »

On Daily Twitter Links for Tuesday 15 January 2013
Ex-Kiwi: One organisation that needs to be investigated ... | more »

On Would a Royal Commission into institutional child sexual abuse be constitutional?